Corentin Denolly vs Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L L W L L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LHead To Head: Denolly 1 - 0 Ganta
They have played 2 sets in total, with Denolly winning 2 and Ganta winning 0. The last match between Denolly and Ganta was at the M25 Kigali, 25-09-2024, First, Clay with Corentin Denolly getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Corentin Denolly | 1 |
| Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta | 0 |
M25 Kigali(25-09-2024)
| Denolly | Stats | Ganta |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (5-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 283 | Ranking | N/A |
| 269 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 24 |
| L | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (412-245) | Career Total W/L | 47% (69-77) |
| $56,935 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Corentin Denolly
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:42:0 | Average Match Time | 1:42:0 |
| 55% (33/60) | 1st Serve % | 74% (60/81) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (30/60) |
| 63% (17/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 51% (41/81) | Return Points Win % | 32% (19/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Corentin Denolly
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Blaise Bicknell
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Corentin Denolly
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Benjamin Willwerth
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Corentin Denolly
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Brandon Holt
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
89 of
129)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
61 of
89)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
119
Total Points Won
123
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
James Kent Trotter
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-7(1) 10-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Vullnet Tashi
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
77%
(
63 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Filiberto Fumagalli
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
36 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
15 of
62)
57
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
40 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
Player
Grigoriy Lomakin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (412/245) | Win/Loss | 47% (69/77) |
| 60% (900/599) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (162/169) |
| 54% (7528/6445) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1655/1669) |
| 56% (61/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (49/56) |
| 66% (293/150) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (20/20) |
| 55% (58/47) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1998 | Aces Total | 267 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1887 | Total Double Faults | 202 |
| 1:26:44 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 499.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 42.95 |
| 65% (26404/40626) | 1st Serve % | 67% (3382/5015) |
| 67% (17798/26404) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2269/3382) |
| 49% (6925/14223) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (782/1633) |
| 45% (2081/4615) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (180/421) |
| 43% (17578/41276) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1855/4947) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (52/66) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 67% (355/175) | Futures W/L | 49% (69/72) |
| 63% (409/648) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (69/145) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (101/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (18/38) |
| 59% (114/192) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (16/40) |
| 90% (397/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (80/63) |
| 10% (397/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (80/16) |
| 21% (260/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (66/6) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
